• Original research article
  • January 10, 2019
  • Open access

THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION IN ENGLAND AND THE PROBLEM OF THE NATIONAL ELECTORAL SYSTEM MODERNIZATION IN THE “LONG EIGHTEENTH CENTURY”

Abstract

The article examines the interrelation between the problem of the British electoral system modernization and the Glorious Revolution outcomes represented in the new social arrangement. The authors identify the changes in the attitude of the English party and political elite to the system of representation and analyse the formation of conditions for the electoral reform. The paper focuses on the following issue: what factors promoted the erosion of the electoral system established after the Glorious Revolution, thus making the reform of 1832 inevitable.

References

  1. Асемоглу Д., Робинсон Дж. А. Экономические истоки диктатуры и демократии / пер. с англ. С. В. Моисеева; под науч. ред. Л. И. Полищука, Г. Р. Сюняева, Т. В. Натхова. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2015. 512 с.
  2. Барлова Ю. Е. «Гнилые местечки» в истории Англии // Вопросы истории. 1999. № 6. С. 150-155.
  3. Королев А. В. Реформа британского парламента: казус С. Т. Кольриджа // Власть. 2009. № 8. С. 179-182.
  4. Косарев А. И. Избирательная коррупция в Англии XVIII в. // Правоведение. 1961. № 4. С. 111-122.
  5. Кузнецова Ю. И. Реформа или революция: вопросы внутриполитического развития Англии и Июльская революция 1830 г. во Франции // Труды кафедры истории Нового и Новейшего времени. 2008. № 2. С. 270-280.
  6. Потапов И. В. Роль электоральных реформ в преобразовании Великобритании в парламентскую монархию в XIX в. // Управленческое консультирование. Актуальные проблемы государственного и муниципального управления. 2008. № 4 (32). С. 184-193.
  7. Самойлова Г. И. Парламентская реформа 1832 года в Англии // Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2009. № 7: в 2-х ч. Ч. 1. С. 68-72.
  8. Aidt T. S., Franck R. Democratization under Threat of Revolution: Evidence from the Great Reform Act of 1832 // Econometrica. 2015. Vol. 83. № 2. P. 505-547.
  9. Aidt T. S., Franck R. How to get the snowball rolling and extend the franchise: voting on the Great Reform Act of 1832 // Public Choice. 2013. Vol. 155. Iss. 3-4. P. 229-250.
  10. Birch A. H. Representative and Responsible Government: An Essay on the British Constitution. L.: George Allen and Unwin, 1964. 252 p.
  11. Cahill G. A. The Popular Movement for Parliamentary Reform, 1829-1832: Some Further Thoughts // The Historian. 1975. Vol. 37. № 3. P. 436-452.
  12. Davis R. W. The Tories, the Whigs, and Catholic Emancipation, 1827-1829 // The English Historical Review. 1982. Vol. 97. № 382. P. 89-98.
  13. Dickinson H. T. The Representation of the People in Eighteenth-Century Britain // Realities of Representation: State Building in Early Modern Europe and European America / ed. by J. Maija. Houndmills (Basingstoke): Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. P. 19-44.
  14. Drake J. D. The Nation’s Nature: How Continental Presumptions Gave Rise to the United States of America. Charlottesville - L.: University of Virginia Press, 2011. 402 p.
  15. Ellis H. A. Aristocratic Influence and Electoral Independence: The Whig Model of Parliamentary Reform 1792-1832 // The Journal of Modern History. 1979. Vol. 51. № 4. On Demand Supplement. P. D1251-D1276.
  16. Jaggard E. Cornwall Politics 1826-1832: Another Face of Reform? // Journal of British Studies. 1983. Vol. 22. № 2. P. 80-97.
  17. Lang S. Parliamentary Reform 1785-1928. L. - N. Y.: Routledge, 1999. 191 p.
  18. McCord N., Purdue B. British History 1815-1914. Second edition. Oxford - N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2007. 612 p.
  19. Morrison B. Channeling the “Restless Spirit of Innovation”: Elite Concessions and Institutional Change in the British Reform Act of 1832 // World Politics. 2011. Vol. 63. № 4. P. 678-710.
  20. O'Gorman F. The Unreformed Electorate of Hanoverian England: The Mid-Eighteenth Century to the Reform Act of 1832 // Social History. 1986. Vol. 11. Iss. 1. P. 33-52.
  21. Pentland G. Scotland and the Creation of a National Reform Movement, 1830-1832 // The Historical Journal. 2005. Vol. 48. Iss. 4. P. 999-1023.
  22. Phillips J. A., Wetherell C. The Great Reform Act of 1832 and the Political Modernization of England // The American Historical Review. 1995. Vol. 100. № 2. P. 411-436.
  23. Phillips J. A., Wetherell C. The Great Reform Bill of 1832 and the Rise of Partisanship // The Journal of Modern History. 1991. Vol. 63. № 4. P. 621-646.
  24. Tilly C. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. L. - N. Y.: Routledge, 2005. 476 p.
  25. Wasson E. A. The Spirit of Reform, 1832 and 1867 // Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies. 1980. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 164-174.
  26. Williams M. S. Burkean “Descriptions” and Political Representation: A Reappraisal // Canadian Journal of Political Science. 1996. № 1. P. 23-45.

Author information

Leonid Vladimirovich Sidorenko

Saint Petersburg University

Nina Eduardovna Adamova

Saint Petersburg University

Yuliya Igorevna Kuznetsova

Saint Petersburg University

About this article

Publication history

  • Received: October 30, 2018.
  • Published: January 10, 2019.

Keywords

  • Славная революция
  • Великая реформа 1832 г
  • концепция фактического представительства
  • аристократический принцип
  • виги
  • тори
  • радикалы
  • представительство
  • The Glorious Revolution
  • The Great Reform of 1832
  • conception of factual representation
  • aristocratic principle
  • Whigs
  • Tories
  • radicals
  • representation

Copyright

© 2019 The Author(s)
© 2019 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)