Objective facts and subjective meanings in Jacques Waardenburg’s neo-phenomenology of religion

Abstract

The study reconstructs the categorical core of Jacques Waardenburg’s neo‑phenomenology of religion through an analysis of the relation between objective religious facts and subjective meanings. The article examines the concepts of religious fact, subjective meaning, intentionality, the supposed/posited object, faith, context, understanding, and the verification of interpretation, as well as their interrelations within the methodological architecture of Waardenburg’s project. The scientific novelty consists in a systematic reconstruction of these concepts as an integrated categorical scheme rather than as an assortment of isolated terms. The study shows that Waardenburg’s project should be understood not as a new essentialist theory of religion but as a shift from describing religious phenomena as external objects toward analyzing religious meanings as structures determined by intentionality and context. It is demonstrated that subjectivity in this approach is not equivalent to arbitrariness: religious meanings become objectified in speech acts, ritual practices, symbolic forms, institutional relations, and believers’ self‑descriptions. The methodological significance of Waardenburg’s neo‑phenomenology is defined by its combination of understanding the insider’s perspective with source‑based, contextual, and logical testing of the researcher’s interpretation.

Research materials

1. Ваарденбург Ж. Размышления о религиоведении, включая эссе о работах Герарда ван дер Леу. Классические подходы к изучению религии: цели, методы и теории исследования. Введение и антология / пер. с англ.; под общ. ред. Е. И. Аринина. Владимир: Изд-во Владим. гос. ун-та, 2010.
2. Waardenburg J. Christians, Muslims, Jews, and their religions // Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations. 2004. Vol. 15. No. 1.
3. Waardenburg J. Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion: Aims, Methods and Theories of Research: in 2 vols. The Hague – P.: Mouton, 1973. Vol. 1.Introduction and Anthology.
4. Waardenburg J. Classical Approaches to the Study of Religion: Aims, Methods and Theories of Research: in 2 vols. The Hague – P.: Mouton, 1974. Vol. 2. Bibliography.
5. Waardenburg J. In Search of an Open Concept of Religion // Religion in History: The Word, the Idea, the Reality / ed. by M. Despland, G. Vallée. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1992.
6. Waardenburg J. Muslims as Actors: Islamic Meanings and Muslim Interpretations in the Perspective of the Study of Religions. Berlin – N. Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 2007.
7. Waardenburg J. Phenomenology of Religion: A Scholarly Discipline, a Philosophy, or an Art? // Waardenburg J. Reflections on the Study of Religion: Including an Essay on the Work of Gerardus van der Leeuw. The Hague – P. – N. Y.: Mouton, 1978a.
8. Waardenburg J. Reflections on the Study of Religion: Including an Essay on the Work of Gerardus van der Leeuw. The Hague – P. – N. Y.: Mouton, 1978b.
9. Waardenburg J. Religion between Reality and Idea: A Century of Phenomenology of Religion in the Netherlands // Numen. 1972. Vol. 19. № 2/3.
10. Waardenburg J. Religionen und Religion: Systematische Einführung in die Religionswissenschaft. Berlin – N. Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 1986.
11. Waardenburg J. The Category of Faith in Phenomenological Research // Waardenburg J. Reflections on the Study of Religion: Including an Essay on the Work of Gerardus van der Leeuw. The Hague – P. – N. Y.: Mouton, 1978c.
12. Waardenburg J. Toward a New Style of Phenomenological Research on Religion // Waardenburg J. Reflections on the Study of Religion: Including an Essay on the Work of Gerardus van der Leeuw. The Hague – P. – N. Y.: Mouton, 1978d.

References

1. Самарина Т. С. Религиоведческое наследие Жака Ваарденбурга: критический анализ // Религиоведение. 2019. № 3. https://doi.org/10.22250/2072-8662.2019.3.117-126
2. Daniels J. How New Is Neo-Phenomenology? A Comparison of the Methodologies of Gerardus van der Leeuw and Jacques Waardenburg // Method & Theory in the Study of Religion. 1995. Vol. 7. № 1. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006895X00207
3. Eliade M. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. N. Y.: Harcourt, 1959.
4. Gadamer H.-G. Truth and Method. 2nd rev. ed. L. – N. Y.: Continuum, 2004.
5. Gebelt J. Über die Intentionen der Intentionsforschung. Zur Neophänomenologie der Religionen von Jacques Waardenburg // Wege und Welten der Religionen. Forschungen und Vermittlungen: Festschrift für Udo Tworuschka / hrsg. von J. Court, M. Klöcker. Frankfurt am Main: Lembeck, 2009.
6. Geertz C. Religion as a Cultural System // Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1973.
7. Husserl E. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1983.
8. Kristensen W. B. The Meaning of Religion: Lectures in the Phenomenology of Religion. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1960.
9. Leeuw G. van der. Religion in Essence and Manifestation: A Study in Phenomenology: 2 vols. N. Y.: Harper & Row, 1963.
10. Otto R. The Idea of the Holy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958.
11. Pye M. Obituary: Jacobus Diederik Jan Waardenburg 1930-2015 // Numen. 2017. Vol. 64. No. 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685276-12341476
12. Smart N. The Phenomenon of Religion. L.: Macmillan, 1973.
13. Smith W. C. The Meaning and End of Religion. N. Y.: Macmillan, 1963.

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: May 20, 2026.
• Published: June 24, 2026.

Keywords

• Жак Ваарденбург
• неофеноменология религии
• религиозный факт
• субъективный смысл
• интенция
• Jacques Waardenburg
• neo-phenomenology of religion
• religious fact
• subjective meaning
• intentionality

Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s)
© 2026 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)