The formation of the concept of digital space

Abstract

The aim of the study is to identify the characteristics of digital space at the contemporary, algorithmically mediated stage of its formation. The article traces the development of the concepts through which digital reality has been described: “cyberspace”, “virtual reality”, and “information space” are examined in terms of the aspects of the digital environment each of them captured, and the limits of their applicability are delineated. On this basis, the category of “digital space” is analyzed and four interrelated properties defining its specificity are identified: socially generated character, autonomy of its own regularities, reciprocal impact, and emergence. The scientific novelty of the study lies in developing an integrated characterization of digital space as a socially produced, technologically mediated, and algorithmically organized configuration of social reality, as well as in describing four properties of the architecture of the contemporary digital environment: preventiveness, personalization, processuality, and performativity. As a result, the study establishes that the limit of applicability of each preceding concept is set by the aspect of the digital environment on which that concept focuses, and becomes apparent once a different aspect turns decisive for the environment. It is shown that the combined operation of the properties of contemporary digital architecture generates a new type of digital inequality, arising from differences in the configurations of what is visible and accessible to users, and renders the boundaries of digital communities less stable and more permeable.

Research materials

1. Barlow J. P. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. Davos, 1996.
2. Gibson W. Neuromancer. N. Y.: Ace Books, 1984.

References

1. Бурлуцкий А. Н. Онтологический смысл категории «виртуальная реальность» в контексте формирования цифровой парадигмы // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2022. № 67. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/67/2
2. Васюков В. Л., Шульга Е. Н. Цифровая онтология и цифровая герменевтика // Вопросы философии. 2024. № 4. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-4-116-125
3. Грачев М. Н. Эхо-камеры, эпистемические пузыри и пузыри фильтров как акторы сетевого коммуникационного пространства // Российская школа связей с общественностью. 2023. № 29. https://doi.org/10.24412/2949-2513-2023-29-41-54
4. Дружинин А. М., Иноземцева Е. В., Гуров Ф. Н. Преодоление «информационного пузыря»: постановка задачи, методология, аналитическое чтение // Ценности и смыслы. 2022. № 3 (79). https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6427-2022-3-96-110
5. Иванов Д. В. Критическая теория цифровизации: господство алгоритмической рациональности и бунт аутентичности // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2023. Т. 26. № 3. https://doi.org/10.31119/jssa.2023.26.3.1
6. Носов Н. А. Виртуальная психология. М.: Аграф, 2000.
7. Путинцева-Арданская В. В. Онтолого-эпистемологический статус цифрового кода: теория медиа и современная визуальная среда: дисс. … к. филос. н. М., 2022.
8. Степанов П. В. Подходы к пониманию цифрового суверенитета России // Журнал российского права. 2024. Т. 28. № 4. https://doi.org/10.61205/jrp.2024.4.1
9. Boyd D. Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications // A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. N. Y.: Routledge, 2010.
10. Deleuze G. Postscript on the Societies of Control // October. 1992. Vol. 59.
11. Floridi L. The Philosophy of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232383.001.0001
12. Gillespie T. The Relevance of Algorithms // Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.001.0001
13. Lessig L. Code: Version 2.0. N. Y.: Basic Books, 2006.
14. Marwick A. E., Boyd D. I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience // New Media & Society. 2011. Vol. 13. № 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: August 18, 2026.
• Published: September 28, 2026.

Keywords

• цифровое пространство
• киберпространство
• виртуальная реальность
• информационное пространство
• цифровое неравенство
• digital space
• cyberspace
• virtual reality
• information space
• digital inequality

Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s)
© 2026 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)