Value foundations of state information policy in foreign postclassical socio-philosophical theories

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to identify the value foundations of state information policy in foreign postclassical socio-philosophical theories. The article examines contemporary theoretical approaches to understanding state information policy in foreign social philosophy from the perspective of the value positioning of the individual, society, and the state within them. As the author notes, the positions of researchers from Antiquity to the metamodern era balance between the collectivist and individualist poles outlined by Plato and Aristotle. The scientific novelty of the study lies in examining current foreign theories and concepts within the framework of the philosophy of information and comparing them with postmodern views. As a result of the study, it was established that the initial premise of the information policy pursued by the state in the contemporary world is its drive for self-preservation, which determines the content of the metanarrative and the choice of appropriate methods for its implementation.

References

1. Агамбен Дж. Номо sacer. Суверенная власть и голая жизнь. М.: Европа, 2011.
2. Бодрийяр Ж. Симулякры и симуляции / пер. с фр. А. Качалова. М.: Издательский дом Постум, 2015.
3. Деррида Ж. О грамматологии / пер. с фр. и вст. ст. Н. Автономовой. М.: Ad Marginem, 2000.
4. Зубофф Ш. Эпоха надзорного капитализма. Битва за человеческое будущее на новых рубежах власти / пер. с англ. А. Ф. Васильева; под науч. ред. Я. Охонько и А. Смирнова. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара, 2022.
5. Кастельс М. Информационная эпоха: экономика, общество и культура / пер. с англ. О. И. Шкаратана. М.: Государственный университет «Высшая школа экономики», 2000.
6. Уэбстер Ф. Теории информационного общества. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2004.
7. Фуко М. Рождение биополитики: курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1978-1979 учебном году / пер. с фр. А. В. Дьяков. СПб.: Наука, 2010.
8. Braman S. Defining Information Policy // Journal of Information Policy. 2011. N. 1. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.1.2011.1
9. Duff A. S. The Past, Present, and Future of Information Policy // Information, Communication & Society. 2004. Vol. 7. N. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118042000208906
10. Floridi L. The Eclipse of the Analogue, the Hardware Turn, and how to Deal with Both // Philosophy & Technology. 2025. Vol. 38. N. 149 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00994-2
11. Floridi L., Buttaboni C., Hine E., Novelli C., Schroder T., Shanklin G. Open-Source AI Made in the EU: Why it is a Good Idea // Minds and Machines. 2025. Vol. 35. N. 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-025-09728-x
12. Froehlich T. J. The role of pseudo-cognitive authorities and self-deception in the dissemination of fake news // Open Information Science. 2019. Vol. 3. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2019-0009
13. McIntyre Lee Post-Truth. Cambridge, МА: MIT Press, 2018.
14. Mestre J. Informational self-deception: deconstruction and reconstruction within philosophy of information // Information Research an International Electronic Journal. 2025. Vol. 30. Nо. 1. https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30CoLIS52312
15. Wurm B., Matt Ch., Benlian A., Hess Th. A revised framework for digital transformation strategies: сontemporary insights and future research pathways // Electronic Markets. 2025. Vol. 35. No. 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-025-00838-z

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: September 8, 2026.
• Published: October 19, 2026.

Keywords

• информационная политика
• зарубежная социальная философия
• постклассические теории
• динамика ценностного позиционирования
• дихотомия коллективизма и индивидуализма
• information policy
• foreign social philosophy
• postclassical theories
• dynamics of value positioning
• dichotomy of collectivism and individualism

Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s)
© 2026 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)