The image of Prometheus in the context of trans- and posthumanist thought: ethical aspects

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to identify the features of using the image of Prometheus as an ethical argumentation tool in the philosophy of transhumanism and posthumanism. The article examines the writings of representatives of transhumanism and posthumanist thinkers, in which the image of Prometheus serves to express or illustrate the ethical positions of these lines of thought. The paper describes and compares two ways of interpreting the image: the Promethean optimism of transhumanism, which emphasizes the moral right of man to technological progress, and the Promethean ambivalence of posthumanism, which draws attention to the ethical and existential problems of technological transformations of human nature. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the fact that for the first time, based on the material of philosophical and futurological texts of trans- and posthumanism, ethical connotations of the image of Prometheus as a symbolic expression of a humanistic and anthropocentric system of representations are revealed. As a result of the study, it was found that the image of Prometheus is equally in demand in both trans- and posthumanist discourse due to its correspondence to the key issues for both trends. At the same time, significant differences in its ethical interpretation have been revealed: transhumanism uses the Promethean myth to substantiate the moral legitimacy of technological improvement of man, while posthumanism turns to the image of Prometheus in order to criticize anthropocentrism and revise the traditional binary oppositions underlying humanistic ethics.

Research materials

1. Деррида Ж. Животное, которым я следовательно являюсь / пер. с фр. Н. Архипова // Социология власти. 2019. Т. 31. № 3.
2. Bostrom N. A History of Transhumanism Thought // Journal of Evolution & Technology. 2005. Vol. 14 (1).
3. Haldane J. B. S. Daedalus or Science and the Future. L.: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co, 1928.
4. Hassan I. Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture? // The Georgia Review. 1977. Vol. 31. No. 4.
5. Latour B. A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Towards a Philosophy of Design. 2008. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/112-DESIGN-CORNWALL-GB.pdf
6. Spitznagel E. Q+A: Ridley Scott’s Star Wars // Esquire. 2012. June 4. https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/interviews/a14300/ridley-scott-prometheus-interview-9423167/?click=main_sr
7. Stock G. Redesigning Humans: our inevitable genetic future. Boston – N. Y.: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002.
8. Young S. Designer Evolution – A Transhumanist Manifesto. N. Y.: Prometheus Books, 2006.

References

1. Катерный И. В. Трансмобильность в постгуманизированном мире: как все еще возможен социальный порядок? // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2018. Т. 18. № 4. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2018-18-4-638-650
2. Кереньи К. Прометей: архетипический образ человеческого существования. М.: Касталия, 2021.
3. Летов О. В. Трансгуманизм и этика // Вестник культурологии. 2008. № 4.
4. Лосев А. Ф. Проблема символа и реалистическое искусство. М.: Искусство, 1976.
5. Маркузе Г. Эрос и цивилизация. Одномерный человек: Исследование идеологии развитого индустриального общества. М.: АСТ, 2003.
6. Мерзляков С. С. Постгуманизм vs трансгуманизм: от «конца исключительности» к «технологическому гуманизму» // Общественные науки и современность. 2022. № 4. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869049922040037
7. Платон. Протагор // Платон. Избранные диалоги. М.: Художественная литература, 1965.
8. Хабермас Ю. Будущее человеческой природы / пер. с нем. М.: Весь Мир, 2002.
9. Шубарт В. Европа и душа Востока. М.: Русская идея, 2000.
10. Canevaro M. The Hybris of the Downtrodden: Honour and Social Control in Ancient Greek Society (and Today) // Hubris, Ancient and Modern: Concepts, Comparisons, Connections / ed. by D. Cairns, N. Bouras and E. Sadler-Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025.
11. Franssen T. Performer or Transformer? Prometheus and “Posthumanism” // Post- and transhumanism: an introduction / ed. by R. Ranisch and S. L. Sorgner. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2014.
12. Lockhart E. N. S. Transhumanism as Capitalist Continuity: Branded Bodies in the Age of Platform Sovereignty // Humans. 2025. Vol. 5. Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/humans5030021

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: March 30, 2026.
• Published: April 24, 2026.

Keywords

• трансгуманистические технологии совершенствования человека
• постгуманистическая критика антропоцентризма
• философские интерпретации образа Прометея
• гуманистическая этика
• transhumanistic technologies of human improvement
• posthumanistic criticism of anthropocentrism
• philosophical interpretations of the image of Prometheus
• humanistic ethics

Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s)
© 2026 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)