Nasserism and Arab nationalism: the transformation of the pan-Arab idea amidst the geopolitical challenges of the Middle East (1948-1961)

Abstract

The aim of the study is to comprehensively characterize Nasserism as a politico-ideological model of Arab nationalism in the second half of the 20th century, identifying the historical and political prerequisites of its emergence, its ideological content, and its significance for the transformation of the Pan-Arab idea. The article examines Nasserism in the context of the crisis of the Arab political order, which intensified after the defeat of the Arab states in the First Arab-Israeli War of 1948-1949, the rise of anti-colonial sentiment, the weakening of traditional mechanisms of political legitimacy, and the search for new forms of regional consolidation. The study demonstrates that Nasserism cannot be reduced merely to the political course pursued by the Egyptian leadership. Rather, it represented a complex synthesis of anti-imperialist principles, pan-Arab concepts, ideas of social transformation, and the imperatives of state-building. Particular attention is given to the influence of the Arab intellectual tradition, including the ideas of Taha Hussein, Satiʿ al-Husri, and Michel Aflaq, on the formation of notions of national unity, political independence, and the historical mission of the Arab peoples. The scholarly novelty of the research lies in interpreting Nasserism as a contradictory political and intellectual construction that emerged at the intersection of pan-Arab universalism and the principle of national-state sovereignty. In contrast to approaches that regard Nasserism primarily as a form of Arab socialism or as an Egyptian authoritarian project of modernization, this article emphasizes the tension between qawmiyya, oriented toward supranational Arab unity based on a shared language, historical memory, and cultural identity, and wataniyya (state-territorial loyalty to a specific country, its institutions, and sovereignty), which affirmed the priority of the particular nation-state. The study concludes that Nasserism possessed a dual historical and political nature. On the one hand, it functioned as an instrument of anti-colonial mobilization, the strengthening of Egyptian sovereignty, the legitimation of socio-economic reforms, and the promotion of Arab solidarity. On the other hand, its practical implementation revealed the structural limitations of pan-Arab integration projects, most clearly manifested in the collapse of the United Arab Republic. At the same time, the article substantiates that the Nasserist legacy did not lose its relevance after the failure of the Egyptian-Syrian union. Its key components – anti-colonialism, social justice, state-oriented modernization, and the idea of Arab unity – continued to influence the political culture and foreign-policy self-identification of Arab states.

Research materials

1. АВП РФ – Архив внешней политики Российской Федерации. Ф. 087. Оп. 13. П. 22. Д. 7.
2. АВП РФ – Архив внешней политики Российской Федерации. Ф. 56 Б. Оп. 9. П. 89. Д. 50.
3. РГАНИ – Российский государственный архив новейшей истории. Ф. 5. Оп. 28. П. 89. Д. 358.

References

1. Васильев А. М. Король Фейсал: личность, эпоха, вера. М.: Восточная литература, 2010.
2. Звягельская И. Д. Новый регионализм и старые проблемы Ближнего Востока // Полис. Политические исследования. 2022. № 6. https:doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.06.05
3. Звягельская И. Д. Арабский Восток в XXI веке: специфика политических процессов // Современная Европа. 2024. № 3.
4. Ильин В. А., Нечаев В. Д. Конструирование региональных пространств в современной геополитике // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения. 2022. Т. 22. № 1.
5. Корнилов А. В. Арабский мир после войны 1948-1949 гг.: кризис легитимности и трансформация политических элит // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2020. Т. 61. № 4.
6. Наумкин В. В. Современный конвергентный арабский национализм в зеркале исторической памяти // Полис. Политические исследования. 2021. № 6. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.06.04
7. Румянцев В. П. Война чужими руками: англо-египетское противостояние в Южной Аравии, 1955-1964 гг. // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25: Международные отношения и мировая политика. 2025. Т. 17. № 2. https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2025-17-2-9-47
8. Dawisha A. Arab Nationalism in the Twentieth Century: From Triumph to Despair. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
9. Doran M. Pan-Arabism Before Nasser. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195123616.001.0001
10. Hasou T. Y. The Struggle for the Arab World. L.: KPI, 1985.
11. Hinnebusch R. The International Politics of the Middle East. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003. https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719053450.001.0001
12. Jankowski J. Nasser’s Egypt, Arab Nationalism, and the United Arab Republic. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781588269904
13. Kamrava M. The Modern Middle East: A Political History since the First World War. 3rd ed. Berkeley – Los Angeles – L.: University of California Press, 2013.
14. Kyle K. Suez: Britain’s End of Empire in the Middle East. L. – N. Y.: Tauris, 2003.
15. Lawson F. H. Constructing International Relations in the Arab World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804768023
16. McNamara R. Britain, Nasser and the Balance of Power in the Middle East, 1952-1967: From the Egyptian Revolution to the Six-Day War. L. – Portland: Frank Cass, 2003.
17. Nasser G. A. The Philosophy of the Revolution. Buffalo, NY: Economica Books, 1959.
18. Nutting A. Nasser. N. Y.: E. P. Dutton, 1972.
19. Podeh E. The Decline of Arab Unity: The Rise and Fall of the United Arab Republic. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 1999.
20. Podeh E. To Unite or Not to Unite – That Is Not the Question // Middle Eastern Studies. 2003. Vol. 39. No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200412331301627
21. Quandt W. B. America and the Middle East // Diplomacy in the Middle East: The International Relations of Regional and Outside Powers / ed. L. C. Brown. L. – N. Y., 2004.
22. Vatikiotis P. J. The History of Modern Egypt: From Muhammad Ali to Mubarak. 4th ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: June 15, 2026.
• Published: July 28, 2026.

Keywords

• арабский национализм
• насеристская идеология
• панарабская интеграция
• национально-государственный суверенитет
• каумизм и ватанизм
• Arab nationalism
• Nasserist ideology
• pan-Arab integration
• national-state sovereignty
• qawmiyya and wataniyya

Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s)
© 2026 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)