Metaphysics of a relational event: towards a dialectic of overcoming the crisis of quantum ontology

Abstract

The aim of the research is to develop a dialectical relational-event ontology (DREO), that is, a second-order metaphysical framework designed to resolve the fundamental problems of the philosophy of quantum physics: wave-particle dualism and the irreducible pluralism of interpretations. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the following: for the first time, not just another interpretation of quantum mechanics is proposed, but a meta-framework that dialectically sublates the pluralism of interpretations itself and demonstrates their systemic unity; the category of a "relational event" is introduced as a fundamental unit of being, which marks a transition from substantial metaphysics (debates on the individuality of objects) to a metaphysics of becoming; wave-particle dualism is interpreted not as ontological (two entities) and not as epistemological (N. Bohr's complementarity principle), but as a dialectical contradiction sublated in the concept of "relational potentiality" – a structure of possibilities actualized depending on the perspective; the complementarity of wave and particle for the first time receives ontological status – it is a mode of existence of quantum reality itself as a "pulsation" between modes of actualization; a new model of scientific rationality is substantiated – dialectical pluralism – where truth is not a property of an individual proposition but a property of the entire system of perspectives taken in their dialectical unity, which fundamentally distinguishes DREO from contextual quantum realism (CQR), which remains within the static opposition of "rule – application" and epistemological perspectivism. The key results of the study are the following ideas: a relational event (rather than an object or a relation in itself) is recognized as the fundamental unit of being – a discrete act of transition from the potential to the actual in a specific context of interaction; "particle" and "wave" are interpreted as two extreme, mutually exclusive and simultaneously complementary types of actualization of a single structure of potencies in different perspectives; the multiplicity of incompatible but empirically equivalent interpretations of quantum mechanics is shown not as a flaw in the theory, but as a logical consequence of the relational structure of reality, which requires a multitude of complementary perspectives for its adequate expression. Thus, the century-old opposition between objectivism and relativism in the philosophy of science is removed.

References

1. Белинский А. В. Интерференция света и отсутствие определенных значений измеряемых величин априори // Сложные системы. 2016. № 4 (21).
2. Бор Н. Избранные научные труды: в 2 т. / под ред. И. Е. Тамма, В. А. Фока, Б. Г. Кузнецова. М.: Наука, 1971. Т. 2: Статьи (1925-1961).
3. Жмудь В. А. Корпускулярно-волновая дилемма и ее противопоставление дуальности // Автоматика и программная инженерия. 2016. № 2 (16).
4. Прись И. Е. Кьюбизм, феноменология и контекстуальный квантовый реализм // Сибирский философский журнал. 2023. Т. 21. № 1. https://doi.org/10.25205/2541-7517-2023-21-1-13-42
5. Прись И. Е., Сторожук А. Ю., Симанов А. Л. Реляционная интерпретация квантовой механики и контекстуальный реализм // Философия науки. 2019. № 2 (81). https://doi.org/10.15372/PS20190204
6. Раджабов О. Р. Квантово-релятивистская картина мира как обобщение квантовой и релятивистской парадигм // Гуманизация образования. 2009. № 2.
7. Терехович В. Э. Квантовая революция или революционные трансформации? // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2025. Т. 62. № 4. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202562454
8. Эйнштейн А., Инфельд Л. Эволюция физики: Развитие идей от первоначальных понятий до теории относительности и квантов. Изд-е 3-е, испр. / пер. с англ. и послесл. С. Г. Суворова. М.: Наука, 1965.
9. Allori V. On quantum mechanics and the pilot-wave theory: empirical equivalence and other objections // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2025. Vol. 62. No. 4.
10. Arroyo R., Arenhart J. R. B. A prolegomenon to a metaphysics of non-individuals for quantum mechanics // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2025. Vol. 62. No. 4.
11. Jaeger G. Heisenberg’s representations of quantum reality // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2025. Vol. 62. No. 4.
12. Karakostas V., Kalyvas P. Objectivism vs perspectivism: traditional Hermeneutics of science and the contemporary quantum paradigm // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2025. Vol. 62. No. 4.
13. Pasqualini M., Fortin S.Interpretation of quantum mechanics and the ontology of phonons // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2025. Vol. 62. No. 4.

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: April 20, 2026.
• Published: July 30, 2026.

Keywords

• диалектическая реляционно-событийная онтология
• контекстуальный квантовый реализм
• корпускулярно-волновой дуализм
• диалектический плюрализм
• реляционное событие
• dialectical relational-event ontology
• contextual quantum realism
• wave-particle dualism
• dialectical pluralism
• relational event

Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s)
© 2026 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)