Machine intelligence as a category of technoculture: operational mediation and limits of technical agency

Abstract

The aim of the research is the explication of the concept of "machine intelligence" as a cultural-philosophical category describing the participation of technical systems in the intellectual practices of modern technoculture. By means of conceptual and comparative analysis, the article examines the semantic heterogeneity of the term "artificial intelligence," identifies the anthropomorphic assumptions of its classical interpretations, and substantiates the distinction between artificial intelligence as a designation of a scientific and technical field and machine intelligence as a cultural-philosophical category. The scientific novelty lies in the interpretation of machine intelligence as a form of operational mediation and in determining the conditions under which this concept is applicable to technical systems. Such conditions include delegating a specific operation to the system, representing a situation in a form accessible for machine processing, having several possible solution options, and incorporating the obtained result into subsequent judgment, choice, or action. As a result, machine intelligence is defined as the ability of a technical system to select or form a relevant result in a situation that allows for several possible solutions. It is shown that such an understanding makes it possible to register the technical agency of machine systems without attributing subjectivity, authorship, or moral responsibility to them.

References

1. Агеев А. И. Искусственный интеллект: туманность определений в неопределенности реалий // Философские науки. 2022. Т. 65. № 1. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-65-1-27-43
2. Винник Д. В. О некоторых вопросах архитектуры искусственной личности // Философия науки и техники. 2022. Т. 27. № 2. https://doi.org/10.21146/2413-9084-2022-27-2-136-149
3. Дубровский Д. И. Эпистемологический анализ социогуманитарной значимости новаций искусственного интеллекта в контексте общего искусственного интеллекта // Философские науки. 2022. Т. 65. № 1. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-65-1-10-26
4. Райков А. Н. Субъектность объяснимого искусственного интеллекта // Философские науки. 2022. Т. 65. № 1. https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-65-1-72-90
5. Резаев А. В., Трегубова Н. Д. Философия общения и искусственный интеллект: опыт сравнительного анализа дискуссий в отечественной и зарубежной литературе // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2024. Т. 61. № 2. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202461230
6. Смирнов С. А. Исчислимо ли бытие человека, или Антропология искусственного интеллекта. Методологический аспект // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Философия и конфликтология. 2023. Т. 39. Вып. 3. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2023.306
7. Шевченко С. Ю. Расширенный разум и эпистемическая ответственность в цифровом обществе // Эпистемология и философия науки. 2021. Т. 58. № 4. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202158470
8. Bates D. W. An Artificial History of Natural Intelligence: Thinking with Machines from Descartes to the Digital Age. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press, 2024.
9. Boyle J. The Line: AI and the Future of Personhood. Cambridge. MA. London: The MIT Press, 2024.
10. Burrell J. How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms // Big Data & Society. 2016. Vol. 3. Nо. 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
11. Coeckelbergh M. Artificial Intelligence, Responsibility Attribution, and a Relational Justification of Explainability // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2020. Vol. 26. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00146-8
12. Coeckelbergh M., Gunkel D. J.Communicative AI: A Critical Introduction to Large Language Models. Cambridge – Hoboken, NJ: Polity Press, 2025.
13. Floridi L. The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
14. Hayles N. K. Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago – London: The University of Chicago Press, 2017.
15. Hui Y. On the Existence of Digital Objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
16. McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955 // AI Magazine. 2006. Vol. 27. No. 4. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904
17. Searle J. R. Minds, Brains, and Programs // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1980. Vol. 3. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
18. Turing A. M.Computing Machinery and Intelligence // Mind. 1950. Vol. 59. No. 236. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
19. Weatherby L. Language Machines: Cultural AI and the End of Remainder Humanism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2025.

Author information

About this article

Publication history

• Received: July 31, 2026.
• Published: September 8, 2026.

Keywords

• машинный интеллект как категория технокультуры
• технокультура
• операциональное посредничество
• техническая агентность
• техническая когниция
• интеллектуальные практики
• философия искусственного интеллекта
• machine intelligence as a category of technoculture
• technoculture
• operational mediation
• technical agency
• technical cognition
• intellectual practices
• philosophy of artificial intelligence

Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s)
© 2026 Gramota Publishing, LLC

User license

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)